Police, The Public, ‘Less Lethal Force’ and Suspects: Deconstructing the human rights arguments

Smith, Rhona (2009) Police, The Public, ‘Less Lethal Force’ and Suspects: Deconstructing the human rights arguments. The Police Journal, 82 (3). pp. 194-211. ISSN 0032-258X

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2009.82.3.445

Abstract

Violent criminals pose threats to the life and well-being of the police and public alike. One response is the development of mid-range ‘less-lethal’ weapons such as TASER® stun guns and other electronic control devices (ECD). These have the power to incapacitate the suspect temporarily, neutralising the threat to the public, the suspect him- or herself and the law enforcement officers. Nevertheless there have been claims that the deployment of such weapons violates human rights. This article thus considers the use of electronic control devices by law enforcement officers within a human rights framework. The principal issues evolve from the coexistence of potential beneficiaries of the salient human rights.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: international law, law enforcement officers, lethal and less lethal force, human rights
Subjects: M100 Law by area
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: Rhona Smith
Date Deposited: 25 Feb 2013 15:34
Last Modified: 20 Jan 2016 11:26
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/11197

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence