The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self-reports

Goldschmidt, Gabriela and Rodgers, Paul (2013) The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self-reports. Design Studies, 34 (4). pp. 454-471. ISSN 0142-694X

[img]
Preview
PDF
GoldschmidtRodgersDesignStudiesDTRS2012Paper.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (385kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.004

Abstract

This paper compares the design thinking approaches of three groups of student-designers: industrial design and architecture undergraduates, and design PhD candidates. Participants responded to an open-ended design brief, working individually. Upon submission of their designs they were debriefed about their design processes. We compare the groups based on their submissions and self-reported design activities, especially the sequence of their design activities and the time allotted to them. There were some commonalities and differences between the two undergraduate groups but the main differences were between the two undergraduates and the PhD students. On the basis of the findings we pose questions regarding design methods in the era of 'design thinking' wherein designers are required to adopt an entrepreneurial frame of mind.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Special Issue: Articulating Design Thinking
Uncontrolled Keywords: design activities, design thinking, time allocation
Subjects: W200 Design studies
Department: Faculties > Arts, Design and Social Sciences > School of Design > Northumbria Design
Depositing User: Ellen Cole
Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2013 11:04
Last Modified: 09 May 2017 21:09
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/11987

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence