Transnational exchange of forensic DNA: viability, legitimacy, and acceptability

McCartney, Carole, Wilson, Tim and Williams, Robin (2011) Transnational exchange of forensic DNA: viability, legitimacy, and acceptability. European Journal of Criminal Justice Research and Policy, 17 (4). pp. 305-322. ISSN 0928-1371

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10610-011-9154-y

Abstract

Forensic DNA profiling and databasing have become increasingly significant resources for criminal investigations in many jurisdictions. More recently, there have been attempts to recruit these technologies into the policing of cross-border organized crime, migration and terrorism. We examined the trajectory of one such attempt, the establishment and operationalisation of the Prüm Treaty within the European Union. We describe the way in which early technological considerations underlying DNA profile exchange, managed within law enforcement bureaucracies, have given way to a concern with broader societal issues and the necessity for a multifaceted scrutiny of this particular technolegal innovation. Central to this issue is the hybrid nature of exchange arrangements created as a result of the European Council Decision on Prüm (2008). The Prüm Treaty departs from the increasingly normalized framework for criminal justice cooperation, and at the same time, does not facilitate DNA exchange within a more traditional multinational instrument. We consider the significance and implications of the political decisions behind Prüm, as well as the consequences for the development of transnational DNA exchange in terms of three key issues: technical and scientific challenges (viability); legal challenges (legitimacy); and ethical and socioeconomic challenges (acceptability). Unless the Prüm structure is reformed, an important and promising initiative may remain encumbered with unresolved problems of legitimacy and acceptability. A lack of direct democratic involvement of many member states precluded the creation of consensus on issues such as privacy, data protection and due process issues, upon which legal and political regimes could then act.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: DNA, Prüm, international exchange
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > School of Law
Depositing User: Carole Mccartney
Date Deposited: 18 Oct 2013 10:11
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2015 13:15
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/14054

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence