Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: Qualitative study of intervention development

Finch, Tracy, Bamford, Claire, Deary, Vincent, Sabin, Neil and Parry, Steve (2014) Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: Qualitative study of intervention development. BMC Health Services Research, 14 (1). ISSN 1472-6963

[img]
Preview
Text
art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6963-14-436.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (348kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-436

Abstract

Background
Fear of Falling (FoF) is commonly reported among older adults (up to 50%) and can impact negatively on physical and social activities, mood and quality of life. This paper explores the development, acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (CBTi) for FoF.

Methods
The process evaluation of the CBTi development phase of an RCT (conducted in the UK) reported here, used ethnographic methods. Data included: interviews with patients and carers (n = 16), clinic staff (n = 6) and the psychologists developing the CBTi (n = 3); observational field notes and transcripts of intervention development meetings (n = 9) and stakeholder engagement meetings (n = 2); and informal discussions with staff developing the CBTi (n = 8). Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT).

Results
The process evaluation showed two domains of work necessary to develop a CBTi that made sense to stakeholders, and that could be delivered as part of an RCT. For the psychologists developing the content of the CBTi, a growing understanding of the complexity of FoF highlighted the need for an individualised rather than a manualised intervention. For the research team, the work involved adapting the structures and processes of the RCT to address preliminary concerns over the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed CBTi.

Conclusions
Theory-based approaches to process evaluation can sensitise researchers to contested understandings about proposed interventions that could undermine implementation. Drawing on the coherence construct of NPT, this study emphasises the nature and extent of work required to ensure an intervention makes sufficient sense to key stakeholders in order to maximise chances of successful implementation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cognitive behavioural therapy, ethnography, falls, fear of falling, intervention development, normalisation process theory, process evaluation
Subjects: B900 Others in Subjects allied to Medicine
C800 Psychology
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > School of Life Sciences > Applied Sciences
Depositing User: Nicola King
Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2014 09:45
Last Modified: 16 May 2017 13:51
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/17828

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence