A Can of Worms: Has Visual Communication a Position of Influence on Aesthetics of Interaction?

Wood, Dave (2011) A Can of Worms: Has Visual Communication a Position of Influence on Aesthetics of Interaction? Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 5 (3). pp. 463-476. ISSN 1833-1874

[img] Microsoft Word (Full text)
Can_of_Worms_Paper_Final.doc - Accepted Version

Download (846kB)
Official URL: http://ijg.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.154/prod.59...

Abstract

Interaction Design is a young discipline that grew out of an overlap of other science and design disciplines, its remit was the design of interactive products, services and systems for human behaviour. Visual Communication and its output of graphic design once had an early influence on Interaction Design, but this has since been devalued by the influence from more functionalist disciplines, leading to two myths about Visual Communication: it just does the ‘aesthetic bit’ on the interface, and that aesthetics has no real use or function beyond ‘beauty’. But aesthetics cannot be reduced and measured as a functionalist equation of ‘means-end’. By understanding aesthetics from a Pragmatist philosophical position, the aesthetics of interaction can be explored from a situated and culturally connected embodiment of an interactive experience. From this position aesthetics is viewed as emergent from the interactive experience through three factors: a socio-cultural context, a personal embodiment and finally a means-to-many-ends instrumentality. It is a cultural phenomenon and not an engineering problem that can be explored quantifiably. This makes this a phenomenological study, and closer to Visual Communication. The rhetorical nature of Visual Communication affords a change in human behaviour, evoking a cognitive and emotional response, making its remit about framing decision-making from use of image and text. Experience, emotion, and interpretation can only use qualitative methods to explore an aesthetic experience. This raises a more vexing question: what other design disciplines also share or rather claim a phenomenological position on aesthetics? This paper will set out to explore these amorphous boundaries to decide if Visual Communication still has an actual support position of influence on Interaction Design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Aesthetics, Pragmatism, Existentialism, Phenomenology, Interaction Design, HCI, Visual Communication
Subjects: W200 Design studies
Department: Faculties > Arts, Design and Social Sciences > Design
Depositing User: Paul Burns
Date Deposited: 19 Feb 2015 14:46
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2017 08:19
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/21444

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence