Unfitness to Plead: Expanding the Scope of 'Objective Evidence' on the 'Trial of the Facts': R v Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail [2015] EWCA Crim 2

Kerrigan, Kevin and Wortley, Natalie (2015) Unfitness to Plead: Expanding the Scope of 'Objective Evidence' on the 'Trial of the Facts': R v Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail [2015] EWCA Crim 2. The Journal of Criminal Law, 79 (3). pp. 160-164. ISSN 0022-0183

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022018315589030b

Abstract

The four conjoined appeals dealt with in this judgment raise similar issues concerning the operation of the ‘trial of the facts’ procedure, which follows a finding that the accused is unfit to plead.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Unfitness to plead, s. 4A hearings, actus reus, mens rea, objective evidence, self-defence
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > School of Law
Depositing User: Paul Burns
Date Deposited: 23 Sep 2015 11:02
Last Modified: 03 Nov 2016 12:57
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/23875

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence