Boothby, Carol (2016) ‘Pigs are not fattened by being weighed’ – so why assess clinic- and can we defend our methods? International Journal of Clinical Legal Education, 23 (1). pp. 137-155. ISSN 1467-1069
|
Text
assessment paper.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (372kB) | Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v23i1.493
Abstract
For those clinics that assess their students, there can be a panoply of issues to consider. The nature of clinic means that the experience of students is non- standardised, not least in terms of workload. Is it appropriate to assess such an experience? How can clinical teachers be sure that their assessment methods are valid and reliable?
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | M900 Other in Law X900 Others in Education |
| Department: | Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School |
| Depositing User: | Carol Boothby |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Jan 2016 14:33 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Nov 2021 17:15 |
| URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/25565 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
