Localism and the Big Society: the asset transfer of leisure centres and libraries – fighting closures or empowering communities?

Findlay-King, Lindsay, Nichols, Geoff, Forbes, Deborah and Macfadyen, Gordon (2017) Localism and the Big Society: the asset transfer of leisure centres and libraries – fighting closures or empowering communities? Leisure Studies. pp. 1-14. ISSN 0261-4367 (In Press)

[img] Text (Article)
Leisure studies paper - Findlay-King 2017.docx - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 8 August 2018.

Download (62kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text (Articles)
Leisure studies paper - Findlay-King 2017.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 8 August 2018.

Download (317kB) | Request a copy
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2017.1285954

Abstract

This paper critically examines the ‘asset transfer’ of leisure services from the public to the voluntary sector. Asset transfer might be theorised as ‘austerity localism’, in which volunteers are obliged to fill the gaps left by retreating public provision, or as ‘progressive localism’, which represents new opportunities through the localism and Big Society agendas to develop more locally responsive, cooperative and mutualist visions. In this way, asset transfer might overcome the limitations of the United Kingdom policies in which ‘Big Government’ is replaced by civic society. Drawing on qualitative interviews with key personnel (volunteers, managers and local authority officers) at 12 leisure facilities, a grounded assessment of the nuanced balance between ‘austerity localism’ and ‘progressive localism’ is provided, including three observations. First, the main impetus for transfer was cuts in local authority budgets which stimulated the emergence of local groups of volunteers. Secondly, the transfers themselves required interaction between local government and the volunteer groups; however, the nature of the relationship and support given varied and support was limited by austerity measures. Thirdly, volunteers do not automatically fill a gap left by the state: without support transfer viability relies on the financial and social capital among volunteer groups, and this is unevenly distributed. These findings suggest that the capacity for a ‘progressive localism’ to emerge through asset transfer is limited. However, where transfer has occurred, there are some progressive benefits of volunteer empowerment and a more flexible service.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Leisure Studies on 8th February 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02614367.2017.1285954.
Uncontrolled Keywords: volunteer, asset transfer, Big Society, progressive localism, austerity localism, leisure
Subjects: L400 Social Policy
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation
Depositing User: Ay Okpokam
Date Deposited: 15 Feb 2017 14:32
Last Modified: 30 Oct 2017 14:13
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/29751

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence