Paying for treatments? Influences on negotiating clinical need and decision-making for dental implant treatment

Exley, Catherine, Rousseau, Nikki, Steele, Jimmy, Finch, Tracy, Field, James, Donaldson, Cam, Thomason, John, May, Carl and Ellis, Janice (2009) Paying for treatments? Influences on negotiating clinical need and decision-making for dental implant treatment. BMC Health Services Research, 9 (1). ISSN 1472-6963

[img]
Preview
Text (Full text)
Exley et al - Paying for treatments.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (279kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-7

Abstract

Background:
The aim of this study is to examine how clinicians and patients negotiate clinical need and treatment decisions within a context of finite resources. Dental implant treatment is an effective treatment for missing teeth, but is only available via the NHS in some specific clinical circumstances. The majority of people who receive this treatment therefore pay privately, often at substantial cost to themselves. People are used to paying towards dental treatment costs. However, dental implant treatment is much more expensive than existing treatments – such as removable dentures. We know very little about how dentists make decisions about whether to offer such treatments, or what patients consider when deciding whether or not to pay for them.

Methods/Design:
Mixed methods will be employed to provide insight and understanding into how clinical need is determined, and what influences people's decision making processes when deciding whether or not to pursue a dental implant treatment. Phase 1 will use a structured scoping questionnaire with all the General dental practitioners (GDPs) in three Primary Care Trust areas (n = 300) to provide base-line data about existing practice in relation to dental implant treatment, and to provide data to develop a systematic sampling procedure for Phase 2. Phases 2 (GDPs) and 3 (patients) use qualitative focused one to one interviews with a sample of these practitioners (up to 30) and their patients (up to 60) to examine their views and experiences of decision making in relation to dental implant treatment. Purposive sampling for phases 2 and 3 will be carried out to ensure participants represent a range of socio-economic circumstances, and choices made.

Discussion:
Most dental implant treatment is conducted in primary care. Very little information was available prior to this study about the quantity and type of treatment carried out privately. It became apparent during phase 2 that ISOD treatment was an unusual treatment in primary care. We thus extended our sample criteria for Phase 3 to include people who had had other implant supported restorations, although not single tooth replacements.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: A400 Clinical Dentistry
B900 Others in Subjects allied to Medicine
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > School of Health, Community and Education Studies > Healthcare
Depositing User: Paul Burns
Date Deposited: 15 Feb 2017 16:24
Last Modified: 10 May 2017 20:05
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/29768

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence