Forensic science, reliability and scientific validity: Advice from America

Ward, Tony, Edmond, Gary, Martire, Kristy and Wortley, Natalie (2017) Forensic science, reliability and scientific validity: Advice from America. Criminal Law Review, 5. pp. 357-378. ISSN 0011-135X

[img]
Preview
Text
PCAST UK revised final sent.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (780kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this article we review an important report produced by the US President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods (the PCAST report).2 The PCAST report builds on an earlier report prepared by the National Research Council, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward published in 2009 (the NRC report).3 These reports are focused on the organisation, funding and practice of the forensic sciences in the US. In their deliberate and unflinching concern with probative value, particularly the validity and reliability of procedures used by forensic scientists and the way opinions are expressed in expert reports and testimony, both have application to England and Wales. Both reports speak directly to forensic scientists, law enforcement, lawyers and courts. Forensic scientists, advocates, judges and legislators must respond to these criticisms and recommendations if we hope to place the forensic sciences on firm scientific foundations.4

Item Type: Article
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: Becky Skoyles
Date Deposited: 20 Mar 2017 09:36
Last Modified: 25 Jun 2018 08:15
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/30123

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence