Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies: a methodological review

Streeter, Adam J, Lin, Nan, Crathorne, Louise, Haasova, Marcela, Hyde, Christopher, Melzer, David and Henley, William (2017) Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies: a methodological review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ISSN 0895-4356 (In Press)

[img] Text (Corrected proof)
S0895435616303341.htm - Other
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (59kB)
[img] Text (Article)
Revised manuscript_MethodReview (1).pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 28 April 2018.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.022

Abstract

Objectives

Motivated by recent calls to use electronic health records for research, we reviewed the application and development of methods for addressing the bias from unmeasured confounding in longitudinal data.

Study Design and Setting

Methodological review of existing literature. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles addressing the threat to causal inference from unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal health data through quasi-experimental analysis.

Results

Among the 121 studies included for review, 84 used instrumental variable analysis (IVA), of which 36 used lagged or historical instruments. Difference-in-differences (DiD) and fixed effects (FE) models were found in 29 studies. Five of these combined IVA with DiD or FE to try to mitigate for time-dependent confounding. Other less frequently used methods included prior event rate ratio adjustment, regression discontinuity nested within pre-post studies, propensity score calibration, perturbation analysis, and negative control outcomes.

Conclusion

Well-established econometric methods such as DiD and IVA are commonly used to address unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies, but researchers often fail to take full advantage of available longitudinal information. A range of promising new methods have been developed, but further studies are needed to understand their relative performance in different contexts before they can be recommended for widespread use.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: method review, unmeasured confounding, unobserved confounding, longitudinal, observational data, electronic health records
Subjects: G300 Statistics
Department: Faculties > Engineering and Environment > Mathematics and Information Sciences
Depositing User: Ay Okpokam
Date Deposited: 17 Jul 2017 12:37
Last Modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:12
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/31338

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence