Rethinking expert opinion evidence

Martire, Kristy and Edmond, Gary (2017) Rethinking expert opinion evidence. Melbourne University Law Review, 40 (3). pp. 967-998. ISSN 0025-8938

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/...

Abstract

This article approaches expert opinion evidence from a scientific, specifically cognitive science, perspective. Decades of scientific research on expertise presents a picture of expertise that bears limited resemblance to the categories and practices used by legal institutions to regulate the admission, presentation and evaluation of expert evidence (ie, opinions based on specialised knowledge). This article seeks to explain why legal institutions should direct more attention to scientifically-based criteria and insights, rather than the somewhat crude set of legal proxies developed by common law judges, if they hope to credibly regulate forensic science and medicine evidence in ways that enhance factual rectitude and fairness.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: M900 Other in Law
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: Becky Skoyles
Date Deposited: 15 Aug 2018 15:21
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2019 19:30
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/35361

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics