Parliament in gross human rights violations: the case of Darfur

Pegan, Andreja and Vermeulen, Wessel N. (2017) Parliament in gross human rights violations: the case of Darfur. Acta Politica, 53 (3). pp. 448-468. ISSN 0001-6810

[img]
Preview
Text (Full text)
Pegan, Vermeulen - Parliament in gross human rights violations AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (266kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0063-z

Abstract

Based on a study of three European parliaments, the article analyses parliamentary oversight on government policy towards gross human rights violations in third countries using the case of Darfur in Sudan (2003–2005). We find that parliaments with greater constitutional rights in foreign policy are more active in the scrutiny of executive action. Scrutiny is stronger in parliaments with developed and strong foreign affairs committees. Media and public awareness correlate with greater oversight activities in all the three chambers considered. In their oversight, MPs do not deter governments to consider the use of armed forces. Rather than revealing party differences, conflicts involving gross human rights violations such as Darfur are venues for the manifestation of division between the executive and legislature.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Parliament, Oversight, Foreign affairs, Darfur, Human rights
Subjects: L200 Politics
Department: Faculties > Arts, Design and Social Sciences > Social Sciences
Depositing User: Paul Burns
Date Deposited: 23 Jan 2019 15:52
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2019 08:05
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/37707

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics