Exacerbating Injustice: Post-Conviction Disclosure in England and Wales

McCartney, Carole and Shorter, Louise (2019) Exacerbating Injustice: Post-Conviction Disclosure in England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. ISSN 1756-0616 (In Press)

[img] Text
Post conv disc FINAL.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 19 October 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (194kB) | Request a copy
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.03.007

Abstract

Following years of debate, the creation of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in England and Wales signified official recognition that the criminal process may sometimes result in unsafe convictions. Central to the operation of the appellate system, is the ability of individuals who claim that their conviction is in error, to revisit and re-examine evidence gathered during the investigation, as well as that relied upon at their trial. High-profile miscarriages of justice have often only been remedied when there has been defence access to materials post-conviction (which had often not been disclosed pre-trial). While there has (rightly) been critical attention paid to pre-trial non-disclosure and the risks this poses to justice, such scrutiny has been lacking post-conviction. And yet, it is arguable that the rationale of preventing miscarriages of justice, which underpins the duties of pre-conviction disclosure, subsists post-conviction. This article examines the duties of disclosure post-conviction, arguing that the Supreme Court judgment in R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary & Anor [2014] UKSC 37 has made it more difficult to gain disclosure post- conviction. It details a worrying picture of inconsistency among police and prosecution authorities, with confusion over what should be retained (and how), and whether disclosure post-conviction should be permitted. It concludes that without significant intervention and reform, miscarriages of justice will continue uncorrected and the appellate system will become inconsequential.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: Becky Skoyles
Date Deposited: 26 Mar 2019 14:39
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2019 08:30
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/38552

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence