Effects of In-Season Velocity- Versus Percentage-Based Training in Academy Rugby League Players

Orange, Sam, Metcalfe, James W., Robinson, Ashley, Applegarth, Mark J. and Liefeith, Andreas (2019) Effects of In-Season Velocity- Versus Percentage-Based Training in Academy Rugby League Players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. ISSN 1555-0265 (In Press)

[img]
Preview
Text
Orange et al - Effects of In-Season Velocity- vs Percentage-Based Training in Academy Rugby League Players AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (187kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0058

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of velocity-based training (VBT) versus percentage-based training (PBT) on strength, speed and jump performance in academy rugby league players during a 7-week in-season mesocycle.

Methods: Twenty-seven rugby league players competing in the Super League U19s Championship were randomised to VBT (n = 12) or PBT (n = 15). Both groups completed a 7-week resistance training intervention (2x/week) that involved the back squat. The PBT group used a fixed load based on a percentage of one repetition maximum (1RM), whereas the VBT group used a modifiable load based on individualised velocity thresholds. Biomechanical and perceptual data were collected during each training session. Back squat 1RM, countermovement jump (CMJ), reactive strength index (RSI), sprint times, and back squat velocity at 40-90% 1RM were assessed pre- and post-training.

Results: The PBT group showed likely to most likely improvements in 1RM strength and RSI, whereas the VBT group showed likely to very likely improvements in 1RM strength, CMJ height, and back squat velocity at 40 and 60% 1RM. Sessional velocity and power were most likely greater during VBT compared with PBT (standardised mean differences [SMDs] = 1.8 to 2.4), whilst time under tension and perceptual training stress were likely lower (SMDs = 0.49 to 0.66). The improvement in back squat velocity at 60% 1RM was likely greater following VBT compared with PBT (SMD = 0.50).

Conclusion: VBT can be implemented during the competitive season, instead of traditional PBT, to improve training stimuli, decrease training stress, and promote velocity-specific adaptations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Velocity-based training, load-velocity relationship, training load, competitive season, resistance training
Subjects: C600 Sports Science
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation
Depositing User: Paul Burns
Date Deposited: 23 Jul 2019 09:13
Last Modified: 13 Nov 2019 14:15
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/40128

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence