Future publication success in science is better predicted by traditional measures than by the h index

Honekopp, Johannes and Khan, Julie (2012) Future publication success in science is better predicted by traditional measures than by the h index. Scientometrics, 90 (3). pp. 843-853. ISSN 0138-9130

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0551-2

Abstract

Although the use of bibliometric indicators for evaluations in science is becoming more and more ubiquitous, little is known about how future publication success can be predicted from past publication success. Here, we investigated how the post-2000 publication success of 85 researchers in oncology could be predicted from their previous publication record. Our main findings are: (i) Rates of past achievement were better predictors than measures of cumulative achievement. (ii) A combination of authors’ past productivity and the past citation rate of their average paper was most successful in predicting future publication success (R 2 ≈ 0.60). (iii) This combination of traditional bibliographic indicators clearly outperformed predictions based on the rate of the h index (R 2 between 0.37 and 0.52). We discuss implications of our findings for views on creativity and for science evaluation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: science, evaluation, creativity, bibliometry, h index
Subjects: C800 Psychology
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > School of Life Sciences > Psychology
Depositing User: Ay Okpokam
Date Deposited: 12 Dec 2011 22:30
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2015 11:35
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/4031

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence