Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: A discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency

Mirelman, Andrew, Mentzakis, Emmanouil, Kinter, Elizabeth, Paolucci, Francesco, Fordham, Richard, Ozawa, Sachiko, Ferraz, Marcos and Baltussen, Rob (2012) Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: A discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency. Value In Health, 15 (3). pp. 534-539. ISSN 1098-3015

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.001

Abstract

Background
Worldwide, there is a need for formalization of the priority setting processes in health. Recent research has used the term multicriteria decision analysis for methods that systematically include preferences for both equity and efficiency. The present study compares decision-makers' preferences at the country level for a set of equity and efficiency criteria according to a multicriteria decision analysis framework.

Methods
Discrete choice experiments were conducted for Brazil, Cuba, Nepal, Norway, and Uganda. By using standardized methods, we elicited preferences for intervention attributes using a individual choice questionnaire. A multinomial logistic regression was applied to estimate the coefficients for all single-policy criteria, per country. Attributes were assigned to an equity group or to an efficiency group. After testing for scale variance, predicted probabilities for interventions with both types of attributes were compared across countries.

Results
The Norway and Nepal groups showed considerable preferences for efficiency criteria over equity criteria with percent change in respective predicted sum probabilities of [10%, −84%] and [6%, −79%]. Brazil and Uganda also showed preference for the efficiency criteria though less convincingly ([−34%, −93%], [−18%, −63%], respectively). The Cuban group showed the strongest preferences with equity attributes dominating efficiency ([−52%, 213%]).

Conclusions
Group preferences of policymakers show explicit but varying trade-offs of efficiency and equity in these diverse settings. This multicriteria decision analysis approach, using discrete choice experiments, indicates that systematic setting of health priorities is possible across a variety of countries. It may be a valuable tool to guide health reform initiatives.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: discrete choice experiment, efficiency, equity, priority setting
Subjects: B900 Others in Subjects allied to Medicine
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > School of Health, Community and Education Studies > Healthcare
Depositing User: Ay Okpokam
Date Deposited: 23 Apr 2012 13:21
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2015 11:35
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/6395

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence