Analysing assessment practice in higher education: how useful is the summative/formative divide as a tool?

McDowell, Liz and Harman, Kerry (2009) Analysing assessment practice in higher education: how useful is the summative/formative divide as a tool? In: Fostering communities of learners: the 13th Biennial EARLI Conference, 25 - 29 August 2009, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Conference paper)
McDowell L, Harman K - Analysing assessment practice... conference paper.pdf

Download (341kB) | Preview

Abstract

A view of assessment as 'naturally' divided into the categories of formative and summative has become a taken-for-granted way of thinking about, talking about and organising assessment in universities, at least in the UK where the division is inscribed in national, institutional and departmental policy and guidance (eg. Quality Assurance Agency, http://www.qaa.ac.uk). In these documents summative and formative assessment tend to be understood as serving separate purposes with summative assessment understood as summing up the level of performance and formative assessment as feeding into future learning. We question the utility of the division in terms of better understanding assessment practices on the basis of an empirical study undertaken in a higher education institution in the UK. The aim of the Assessment Environments & Cultures project is to gain a better understanding of how academics assess and why they assess in the ways that they do. Interview and observational data have been collected from academics working in three subject areas: Design, Business and Applied Sciences. Initial analysis has focussed on the discourses in use and the subject positions taken up by academics when they talk about and undertake assessment. Analysis of our data suggests that, whilst academics used the categories of formative and summative to talk about their assessment practices, the distinction between assessment purposes may be 'messier' than the separate categories imply. Various examples from the project will be introduced to illustrate this point. This raises a number of questions in terms of researching assessment practices that will be raised for discussion at the roundtable. For example:Might it be useful to understand formative and summative assessment as occupying a shared and contested space rather than as distinct categories?

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Subjects: X900 Others in Education
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > School of Health, Community and Education Studies > Education and Lifelong Learning
Related URLs:
Depositing User: EPrint Services
Date Deposited: 13 Oct 2010 10:06
Last Modified: 18 May 2017 04:44
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/68

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics


Policies: NRL Policies | NRL University Deposit Policy | NRL Deposit Licence