Re-examining the ‘reliability’ of forensic pathology evidence

Wilson, Tim, Jackson, Adam, Gallop, Angela and Piasecki, Emma (2018) Re-examining the ‘reliability’ of forensic pathology evidence. In: Forensic Science Evidence and Expert Witness Testimony: Reliability through Reform? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 184-212. ISBN 9781788111027, 9781788111034

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

This chapter considers how forensic pathology sits within the general domain of medical science and operates according to its own professional standards, regulatory mechanisms and cultural norms, which intersect with legal processes in distinctive ways. Having reviewed the discipline’s current institutional structure in England and Wales, and highlighted certain structural risks arising from these institutional arrangements, ‘critical trust’ is advocated as the best standard for regulating reliance on forensic pathology expert evidence and assessing its probative value. Pathologists draw on an exceptional width of disciplinary knowledge, indicating the desirability of greater professional autonomy in casework decision-making. Respect for informed professionalism is contrasted with the risks of excessive cultural deference, harking back to the days of celebrity medical witnesses personified by Sir Bernard Spilsbury. The chapter then presents two detailed ‘case studies’ of criminal appeal judgments in which forensic pathology evidence played a pivotal role. These cases exemplify in microcosm the potential for injustice when the reliability of pathology evidence is doubtful or misinterpreted. Reform options are canvassed.

Item Type:	Book Section
Subjects:	F400 Forensic and Archaeological Science M900 Other in Law
Department:	Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Related URLs:	Publisher
Depositing User:	Paul Burns
Date Deposited:	05 Nov 2018 17:02
Last Modified:	17 Mar 2020 11:10
URI:	http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/36508

Downloads