Counter-Radicalisation Through Safeguarding: A Political Analysis of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act (2015)

Dresser, Paul (2018) Counter-Radicalisation Through Safeguarding: A Political Analysis of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act (2015). Journal for Deradicalization, 16. pp. 125-164. ISSN 2363-9849

[img]
Preview
Text
165-575-1-PB.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (443kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/vi...

Abstract

The Counter-Terrorism and Security Act (CTSA) mandates specified authorities to demonstrate due regard to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism; what is better known as the ?PREVENT Duty?. As part of this duty, public sector workers are required to identify a person?s proclivity for radicalisation, and, in turn, report concerns as a safeguarding measure. Drawing upon Rose and Miller?s matrix of political analysis, this article explores the PREVENT Duty through three theoretical areas: political rationalities; problematisations; and technologies of government. Framing the CTSA as a political rationality helps conceptualise the justifications and exercise of power in and between diverse authorities. Central to this is the way problematisations of risks connect to forms of knowledge, practices and technologies which become reproblematised and (de)politicised to create (un)stable assemblages of (in)security. The utility of governmental technologies helps situate PREVENT as it permeates the actuarial practices of mundane social care environments. Related to this, I draw attention to the governance of PREVENT which, I argue, is realised discursively through language. Through these theoretical frameworks I explore PREVENT as having undergone a process of rectification; this entails the mutation of PREVENT towards safeguarding. At a broader level, this article contributes to a reconstituted understanding of PREVENT by examining the intertwining of social care structures and counter-radicalisation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: PREVENT, PREVENT Duty, radicalisation, safeguarding, political analysis
Subjects: L300 Sociology
L400 Social Policy
Department: Faculties > Arts, Design and Social Sciences > Social Sciences
Depositing User: Elena Carlaw
Date Deposited: 08 Jun 2020 12:43
Last Modified: 08 Jun 2020 12:45
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/43367

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics