Thomas, Rod (2020) Keynes, Kuhn and the sociology of knowledge: a comment on Pernecky and Wojick. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44 (6). pp. 1415-1424. ISSN 0309-166X
|
Text
SecondREVISEDcommentPernechyandWojicknotesemendforPURE.pdf - Accepted Version Download (258kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Mark Pernecky and Paul Wojick use T.S. Kuhn’s philosophy of science to diagnose ‘The problematic nature and consequences of the effort to force Keynes into the conceptual cul-de-sac of Walrasian economics’. But their diagnosis is itself problematical in nature and consequence. It assumes the virtues of a pre-Kuhnian philosophy of knowledge that the Kuhnian meta-framework overtly discards. One way to eliminate the inconsistency is to recognise that Kuhn’s philosophy of science and sociology of knowledge function to immunise theories from criticism. Anyone who wishes to embrace a sociologically more critical philosophy ought to consider instead the philosophical attitude of critical rationalism.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Keynes, Kuhn, Popper, Paradigm, Sociology of Knowledge |
| Subjects: | L300 Sociology N300 Finance N600 Human Resource Management |
| Department: | Faculties > Business and Law > Newcastle Business School |
| Depositing User: | Rachel Branson |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2020 10:51 |
| Last Modified: | 31 Jul 2021 14:17 |
| URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/43817 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
