Prosecuting Child Offenders: Factors Relevant to Rebutting the Presumption of Doli Incapax

Crofts, Thomas (2018) Prosecuting Child Offenders: Factors Relevant to Rebutting the Presumption of Doli Incapax. Sydney Law Review, 40 (3). pp. 339-365. ISSN 0082-0512

[img]
Preview
Text
13.pdf - Published Version

Download (392kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journ...

Abstract

Despite existing since ancient times the presumption of doli incapax — that is, the presumption that children lack the moral and intellectual development to have the capacity to be guilty of crime — appears to be a relatively nebulous concept. Criticisms that the presumption is both over- and under-protective of children reveal diverse views and uncertainty about exactly how the presumption (and its legislative equivalents) does, and should, operate. This article takes the occasion of the recent High Court of Australia case of RP v The Queen 2016 HCA 53; (2016) 259 CLR 641 as a prompt to address this lack of clarity. It comprehensively reviews current case law to critically evaluate the sort of factors that have been used to establish that a child is sufficiently developed to be found criminally responsible.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: M100 Law by area
M200 Law by Topic
M900 Other in Law
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: Rachel Branson
Date Deposited: 21 Jul 2020 11:19
Last Modified: 21 Jul 2020 11:30
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/43845

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics