The UK Forensic Science Regulator: Fit for Purpose?

Nsiah Amoako, Emmanuel and McCartney, Carole (2021) The UK Forensic Science Regulator: Fit for Purpose? WIREs Forensic Science, 3 (6). e1415. ISSN 2573-9468

[img]
Preview
Text (Final published version)
wfs2.1415.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Advance online version)
wfs2.1415.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1415

Abstract

The role of Forensic Science Regulator (FSR), created in 2007, was established to assure the achievement and maintenance of forensic science service (FSS) provision that commands public confidence. The FSR works at an organizational level, to assure, and improve the quality of forensic service provision and manage the risks of quality failures by Forensic Service Providers (FSPs). Despite this apparent introduction of “regulation,” forensic science provision in the United Kingdom has continued to receive a critical assessment. FSPs are meant to voluntarily adopt the Regulator's quality standards, achieve and maintain accreditation, and comply with regulatory requirements and guidance, including reporting complaints and quality failures to the Regulator. The effectiveness of the FSR thus cannot be gauged by examination of the actions of the Regulator alone, but also requires evidence of impact upon FSPs. Using public data, supplemented by interviews with FSS providers, to facilitate an initial assessment of whether the FSR's role is “fit for purpose,” we outline five demands made of FSPs in delivering FSSs to the criminal justice system and the five objectives of the FSR to support and enhance the ability of FSPs to meet these demands. We provide a prefatory commentary on whether the FSR is able to effectively fulfill this purpose. It is argued that the FSR role in its current form cannot be considered “fit for purpose” when evidence of the impact of regulation is lacking. Finally, we briefly summarize “inhibitors” that prevent the FSR from being more effective.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accreditation, forensic science providers, forensic science quality, forensic science regulation, quality standards
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: Elena Carlaw
Date Deposited: 12 Feb 2021 14:17
Last Modified: 15 Oct 2021 11:15
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/45421

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics