Advanced molecular pathology for rare tumours: A national feasibility study and model for centralised medulloblastoma diagnostics

Crosier, Stephen, Hicks, Debbie, Schwalbe, Ed, Williamson, Daniel, Nicholson, Sarah Leigh, Smith, Amanda, Lindsey, Janet C., Michalski, Antony, Pizer, Barry, Bailey, Simon, Bown, Nick, Cuthbert, Gavin, Wharton, Stephen B., Jacques, Thomas S., Joshi, Abhijit and Clifford, Steven C. (2021) Advanced molecular pathology for rare tumours: A national feasibility study and model for centralised medulloblastoma diagnostics. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. ISSN 0305-1846 (In Press)

[img]
Preview
Text (Advance online version)
nan.12716.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Text
nan.12716.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 7 April 2022.

Download (17MB) | Request a copy
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12716

Abstract

AimsApplication of advanced molecular pathology in rare tumours is hindered by low sample numbers, access to specialised expertise/technologies, and tissue/assay QC and rapid reporting requirements. We assessed the feasibility of co‐ordinated real‐time centralised pathology review (CPR), encompassing molecular diagnostics and contemporary genomics (RNA‐seq/DNA methylation array). Methods This nationwide trial in medulloblastoma (<80 UK diagnoses/year) introduced a national reference centre (NRC), and assessed its performance and reporting to World Health Organisation standards. Paired frozen/FFPE tumour material were co‐submitted from 135 patients (16 referral centres).ResultsComplete CPR diagnostics were successful for 88% (120/135). Inadequate sampling was the most common cause of failure; biomaterials were typically suitable for methylation‐array (129/135, 94%), but frozen tissues commonly fell below RNA‐seq QC requirements (53/135, 39%). Late reporting was most often due to delayed submission. CPR assigned or altered histological variant (vs. local diagnosis) for 40/135 tumours (30%). Benchmarking/QC of specific biomarker assays impacted test results; iFISH most accurately identified high‐risk MYC/MYCN amplification (20/135, 15%), while combined methods (CTNNB1/chr6 status, methylation‐array subgrouping) best‐defined favourable‐risk WNT tumours (14/135; 10%). Engagement of a specialist pathologist panel was essential for consensus assessment of histological variants and immunohistochemistry. Overall, CPR altered clinical risk‐status for 29% of patients.ConclusionNational real‐time CPR is feasible, delivering robust diagnostics to WHO criteria and assignment of clinical risk‐status, significantly altering clinical management. Recommendations and experience from our study are applicable to advanced molecular diagnostics systems, both local and centralised, across rare tumour types, enabling their application in biomarker‐driven routine diagnostics and clinical/research studies.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Funding information: This study was funded by The Brain Tumour Charity, Cancer Research UK, The Tom Grahame Trust and The INSTINCT network (co-funded by The Brain Tumour Charity, Great Ormond Street Children's Charity, and Children with Cancer UK). TSJ is supported by the National Institute for Health Research and a Great Ormond Street Hospital UCL Biomedical Research Centre award.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Physiology (medical), Neurology, Histology, Clinical Neurology
Subjects: B100 Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology
C100 Biology
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Applied Sciences
Depositing User: Rachel Branson
Date Deposited: 19 Apr 2021 13:53
Last Modified: 31 May 2021 14:37
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/45950

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics