A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study

Hilton, Paul, Armstrong, Natalie, Brennand, Catherine, Howel, Denise, Shen, Jing, Bryant, Andrew, Tincello, Douglas G., Lucas, Malcolm G., Buckley, Brian S., Chapple, Christopher R., Homer, Tara, Vale, Luke, McColl, Elaine, Howlett, Helen and INVESTIGATE studies group, (2015) A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study. Trials, 16 (1). p. 400. ISSN 1745-6215

[img]
Preview
Text
s13063-015-0928-2.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0928-2
Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Funding Information: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (reference 09/22/136). The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health. The authors also acknowledge the support of the NIHR, through the Comprehensive Clinical Research Network.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Feasibility studies, Interview studies, Pilot studies, Randomised controlled trial, Stress urinary incontinence, Urodynamics
Subjects: A900 Others in Medicine and Dentistry
B200 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Nursing, Midwifery and Health
Depositing User: Rachel Branson
Date Deposited: 11 Feb 2022 15:50
Last Modified: 11 Feb 2022 16:00
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/48446

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics