Comparing Transnational Legal Orders: Criminalisation, Labour Law and Forced Labour

Fouladvand, Shahrzad and Ward, Tony (2021) Comparing Transnational Legal Orders: Criminalisation, Labour Law and Forced Labour. Journal of International and Comparative Law, 9 (1). ISSN 2313-3775 (In Press)

[img] Text
Comp_Transnat_Leg_Orders.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 15 March 2023.

Download (442kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Two transnational legal regimes aim to counter some of the most severe forms of labour exploitation: one centred on the Palermo Protocol supplemented to the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (UNTOC) and the other on the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions. This article focuses on the relationship between transnational criminal law (TCL) and transnational labour law (TLL) and their effectiveness in tackling labour exploitation. Criminalisation and labour regulation have been seen as competing ‘paradigms’ in tackling human trafficking and modern slavery. TCL has been effective in diffusing criminal law norms around the world, but the modest number of resulting prosecutions can do little tackle the huge global market in forced or severely exploited labour. TLL, with its more decentralised and pluralistic structure, offers greater hope of achieving some alleviation of labour exploitation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Criminal Justice, labour law, transnational law, modern slavery, ILO, Qatar
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: John Coen
Date Deposited: 28 Apr 2022 14:32
Last Modified: 28 Apr 2022 14:45
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/48991

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics