Limitations and Recommendations for Advancing the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis of the Literature

Jesus, Tiago S., Mani, Karthik, Ledgerd, Ritchard, Kamalakannan, Sureshkumar, Bhattacharjya, Sutanuka and von Zweck, Claudia (2022) Limitations and Recommendations for Advancing the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis of the Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (12). p. 7327. ISSN 1660-4601

[img]
Preview
Text
ijerph-19-07327.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (832kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127327

Abstract

Occupational therapy workforce research can help determine whether occupational therapists exist in sufficient supply, are equitably distributed, and meet competency standards. Advancing the value of occupational therapy workforce research requires an understanding of the limitations and recommendations identified by these investigations. This scoping review and content analysis synthesizes the study limitations and recommendations reported by the occupational therapy research worldwide. Two independent reviews included 57 papers from the past 25 years. Stated limitations included: focus on cross-sectional studies with small and convenience samples; participants from single settings or regions; local markets or preferences not specified; focus on self-reported data and intentions (rather than behaviors or occurrences); challenges in aggregating or synthesizing findings from descriptive data; lack of statistical adjustment for testing multiple associations; and the lack of detailed, up-to-date, and accessible workforce data for continuous monitoring and secondary research. Stated recommendations included: strengthening routine workforce data collection; developing longitudinal studies that include interventions (e.g., recruitment or retention packages); developing context-sensitive comparisons; studying the impact on ultimate outcomes; promoting nation-wide, coordinated workforce plans and requirements; and fostering international coalitions for workforce research and developments at scale. These study limitations and recommendations reported by the literature must be considered in the design of a local and global occupational therapy workforce research agenda.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Funding information: T.S.J.: OTD, completed this work under an Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant number: 90ARHF0003). NIDILRR is a center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Uncontrolled Keywords: health personnel, health workforce, human resources for health, occupational therapists, rehabilitation, review
Subjects: A900 Others in Medicine and Dentistry
F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing
Depositing User: Rachel Branson
Date Deposited: 12 Jul 2022 15:35
Last Modified: 12 Jul 2022 15:45
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/49536

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics