Recognizing secular defilement: Douglas, Durkheim and housework

Duschinsky, Robbie (2014) Recognizing secular defilement: Douglas, Durkheim and housework. History and Anthropology, 25 (5). pp. 553-570. ISSN 0275-7206

PDF (Article (Accepted version))
Duschinsky_Recognising_secular_defilement.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (679kB) | Preview
Official URL:


Mary Douglas is generally regarded as a faithful disciple of Émile Durkheim. Yet her classic work Purity and Danger ([1966] 2002. London: Routledge) is best understood as premised upon a fundamental disagreement with Durkheim, who she accused of conflating purity with “the sacred” and impurity with “the profane”. Key to this disagreement was the theoretical status of the “busy scrubbings” of everyday housework. This disagreement has had a substantial legacy since, in turning her attention to purity and impurity in their specificity, Douglas bequeathed anthropology and sociology a theory of purity and impurity that has remained an important, perhaps even dominant, paradigm. This paradigm has been identified as an exemplar of synchronic analysis. Yet this paradigm itself is the product of a specific historical and intellectual context, little recognized today. Attending to this context holds open possibilities, which have otherwise tended to be neglected, for theorizing purity and impurity in their specificity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: defilement, Mary Douglas, Mile Durkheim, purity, sacredness
Subjects: L500 Social Work
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing
Depositing User: Users 6424 not found.
Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2014 10:07
Last Modified: 17 Dec 2023 16:17

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics