Hewitt, David (2012) Objection, purpose and normality: Three ways in which the courts have inhibited safeguarding. The Journal of Adult Protection, 14 (6). pp. 280-286. ISSN 1466-8203
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14668201211286057
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Court of Appeal, Deprivation of liberty, law courts, mental illness, normality, objection, purpose, United Kingdom |
| Subjects: | M100 Law by area M200 Law by Topic |
| Department: | Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School |
| Depositing User: | Becky Skoyles |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Jan 2015 14:47 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Oct 2019 00:38 |
| URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/20715 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
