Badar, Mohamed and Rastan, Rod (2016) Article 11 Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis. In: Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court:. Observers’ Notes, Article by Article. Hart & C.H. Beck, Munich, pp. 645-660. ISBN 9783406648540
Text
Badar and Rasten Article 11 Jurisdiction ratione temporis .pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (221kB) |
Abstract
This is a commentary on Article 11 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Jurisdiction ratione temporis). The temporal parameters of the Court’s jurisdiction are restricted to crimes committed after its entry into force, which occurred on 1 July 2002. However, in terms of crimes that pre-date the Statute’s entry into force, but whose occurrence continues past 1 July 2002, the authors draw a fine line between two different categories of ‘continuing crimes’: (a) conduct where the actus reus is partly completed in the past, the effects of which continue to this day; (b) and conduct that constitutes an ongoing course of criminal activity, all of whose material elements continue to occur on a daily basis. The authors also examined the notion of ‘continuing crimes’ under human rights instruments particularly enforced or involuntary disappearances of persons as a serious violation of human rights and as a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute. Setting aside, the question of continuing crimes, the authors noted that international courts and tribunals have accepted the admission of evidence which pre-dates the applicable temporal jurisdiction for contextual purpose.
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 3rd edition. |
Subjects: | M100 Law by area |
Department: | Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School |
Depositing User: | Mohamed Badar |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jan 2016 10:01 |
Last Modified: | 01 Aug 2021 01:31 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/25476 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year