Expert evidence reliability: the criminal, civil, family trichotomy

Stockdale, Michael (2015) Expert evidence reliability: the criminal, civil, family trichotomy. In: Northumbria Research Conference 2015, 20 May 2015, Northumbria University.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL:


The reliability of expert evidence has become a major problem for the criminal, civil and family courts in recent years. First, the admission of unreliable expert evidence has the potential to result in miscarriages of justice if the courts fail to identify the limited probative value of such evidence. Secondly, even where the limited probative value of such evidence is eventually identified by the tribunal of fact, its admission may have already imposed financial burdens upon the increasingly limited funding available in the criminal, civil and family justice systems. Reforms have taken place in all three jurisdictions but have not been consistent and academic analysis of them tends to concentrate on one specific context rather than adopting a global approach. This paper will identify the principal causes of unreliability, contrast and compare the reforms that have taken place in the three jurisdictions and consider whether there are lessons to be learned from each that can be transferred to the others.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: Michael Stockdale
Date Deposited: 25 Jan 2016 11:49
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2019 23:06

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics