McGrogan, David (2016) The Problem of Causality in International Human Rights Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 65 (3). pp. 615-644. ISSN 0020-5893
|
Text (Full text)
McGrogan-MDE_updated.pdf - Accepted Version Download (502kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (Article)
-ILQ-S002058931600021Xa.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (446kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The field of human rights monitoring has become preoccupied with statistical methods for measuring performance, such as benchmarks and indicators. This is reflected within human rights scholarship, which has become increasingly ‘empirical’ in its approach. However, the relevant actors developing statistical approaches typically treat causality somewhat blithely, and this causes critical problems for such projects. This article suggests that resources – whether temporal or fiscal - may be better allocated towards improving methods for identifying violations rather than developing complicated, but ultimately ineffective, statistical methods for monitoring human rights performance.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Human rights, international law, philosophy of science, social science, empirical research |
Subjects: | G300 Statistics M100 Law by area M200 Law by Topic M900 Other in Law |
Department: | Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School |
Depositing User: | David Mcgrogan |
Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2016 14:25 |
Last Modified: | 01 Aug 2021 09:17 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/26685 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year