Peart, Daniel, Shaw, Matthew and Rowley, Chris (2014) Validity of Freely Available Mobile Applications for Recording Resting Heart Rate. Annals of Biological Research, 5 (12). pp. 11-15. ISSN 0976-1233
|
Text
Validity of Freely Available Mobile Applications for Recording Resting Heart.pdf - Published Version Download (245kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study examined the accuracy of mobile applications that measure heart rate by comparing results to a Polar heart rate monitor. Volunteers had their heart rate measured via four different methods whilst being simultaneously recorded with the Polar monitor; 1) manual (MAN), 2) Tap the Pulse (TAP), 3) Cardiio (CAR), 4) What’s my Heart Rate (WMHR). There were no significant differences between any of the methods and Polar monitor (p ≥ 0.159), with WMHR having the strongest relationship (r2 = 0.918) followed by MAN (r2 = 0.851), CAR (r2 = 0.646) andTAP (r2 = 0.636) respectively.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Heart rate, mobile application, health, tablet computer |
Subjects: | C600 Sports Science J900 Others in Technology |
Department: | Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation |
Depositing User: | Dr Daniel Peart |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jul 2016 14:43 |
Last Modified: | 01 Aug 2021 05:33 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/27104 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year