IPRexit. Intellectual property after the EU referendum

Noto La Diega, Guido (2016) IPRexit. Intellectual property after the EU referendum. In: SLS 2016 - The Society of Legal Scholars Annual Conference, 6th - 9th September 2016, Oxford, UK.

Preview

Other (Poster) IPREXIT simpified correct.pdf - Presentation Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0. Download (940kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Government is deciding how and when to trigger Article 50 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In the meantime, some “remainers” are pointing out the allegedly tragic consequences of Brexit, whereas a more cautious approach would be wise. There is much uncertainty on the future of intellectual property (IP) in the UK after the referendum and one could foresee that there will be more cons than pros. However, some opportunities may as well arise. This poster aims to assess the impact of Brexit on IP by distinguishing between areas that do not need significant intervention, areas where no real intervention will be allowed and areas where there is need for an update. In the near future, the Government and the Parliament will be likely focused on the negotiations with the European Union and there is the risk that IP issues will be overlooked. Therefore, it will be up to the judiciary to modernise intellectual property and ensure that the UK does not depart radically from the IP systems of the Member States. Thus, by ensuring a substantial, albeit not full, harmonisation of the relevant rules, fragmented IP regimes will not constitute trade barriers and the UK will retain its appeal as a thriving marketplace for investors. In order to do so, some “IP regimes shopping” will be useful, although this will mean a partial departure from the EU rules. A takeaway is that since English judges will not be entitled to preliminary references to the Court of Justice, they will become eventually European judges.

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads