Crumey, Andrew (2002) Dot.com Lite. Irish Pages, 1 (2). pp. 241-245. ISSN 1477-6162
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
How are literary reputations constructed? Granta magazine's recent listing, "The Best of Young British Novelists", is a case in point. When the exercise was first tried in 1983, it was against a background dominated by middle-aged or elderly writers such as Golding, Greene and Burgess. That a line-up of proven authors under 40 could include the likes of Julian Barnes, Martin Amis and Ian McEwan was seen as remarkable, and a sign that times were changing. But already in 1993, when Granta made a second list, the cult of youth had become wearying. And by January 2003, when the latest round-up was announced, cynicism had set in. Were these meant to be writers of real achievement, or young hopefuls? The boundaries, it seems, have become so blurred - by publishers and the media - that promise now equals achievement: predictions of literary success are a self-fulfilling prophecy. Reputations, it appears, are now manufactured in advance by publicists, and all the media need do is amplify the "buzz" surrounding the latest new name. I intend to question the accuracy of this assumption, arguing that glamorous young authors are hardly a new phenomenon.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | P300 Media studies P400 Publishing P500 Journalism Q200 Comparative Literary studies |
Department: | Faculties > Arts, Design and Social Sciences > Humanities |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | Andrew Crumey |
Date Deposited: | 24 Oct 2016 16:02 |
Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2019 10:03 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/28128 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year