Kelly, Matthew (2009) Irish Nationalist Opinion and the British Empire in the 1850s and 1860s. Past & Present, 204 (1). pp. 127-154. ISSN 0031-2746
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Ireland's historical position within the British Empire has become a contentious issue for historians, literary critics and commentators. The debate has generated heated scholarly exchanges, exposing the fault-lines that run through Irish studies. At one end of the spectrum of opinion, Terry Eagleton has argued that ‘there are ... two kinds of invisibility: one which arises from absence, and the other from over-obtrusive presence’. This over-obtrusive presence, for Eagleton, is the colonial relationship between Britain, the colonial power, and Ireland, the colony, a relationship which makes it appropriate to consider Ireland's experiences as similar to non-European colonies. Eagleton implies that so obviously did Ireland comprise a colonized society of this sort that to argue otherwise must reflect a wider agenda. Seamus Deane is less elliptical, relating the dispute directly to the ideologies and mentalités underpinning the way Irish history is written. ‘The rhetoric of [historical] revisionism’, he asserts, ‘obviously derives from the rhetoric of colonialism and imperialism’. Whether this is symptomatic of historians’ unreflexiveness, of their incapacity to develop a consciousness of the discourses within which they write, or whether their innate conservatism renders them collaborators with colonialism, is not entirely clear.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | L200 Politics V300 History by topic |
Department: | Faculties > Arts, Design and Social Sciences > Humanities |
Depositing User: | Paul Burns |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jan 2017 12:52 |
Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2019 19:22 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/29136 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year