The Claims of Generalized Darwinism

Thomas, Rod (2018) The Claims of Generalized Darwinism. Philosophy of Management, 17 (2). pp. 149-167. ISSN 1740-3812

claimsofgeneralizeddarwinismforNRL.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (411kB) | Preview
Official URL:


Generalized Darwinism (GD) claims to be a conceptual and theoretical framework for researching evolutionary change processes in organizations. This paper examines the claims of GD. It finds that in contrast to Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection proper, the GD framework is not an explanatory deductive argument form. What it is that GD actually generalizes and intends to explain thereby becomes somewhat moot. It is proposed that the so-called ‘generalization’ that the GD framework supplies might be best understood schematically. Two general schemata that purport to distil commonalities between processes of organizational evolution and biological evolution are thereby identified. But in considering the applicability of the two schemata to organizational evolution, criticism reveals one to be problematic, whereas the other one, to which the GD programme collapses if the problematical schema is dispensed with, has been long associated with another so-called ‘evolutionary approach’ to the understanding of social change: Sir Karl Popper’s ‘evolutionary epistemology’. The paper concludes that if the research problem is to account for the evolutionary character of social and organizational change, then theorists need not commit to the GD framework. They may elect to use Popper’s evolutionary epistemology instead.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Organization, Evolution, Darwin, Popper
Subjects: N200 Management studies
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Newcastle Business School
Depositing User: Becky Skoyles
Date Deposited: 25 May 2017 11:07
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2021 21:49

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics