Early Clinical Results of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve in 139 Patients: Freeman Experience

Mujtaba, Syed Saleem, Ledingham, Simon, Shah, Asif Raza, Clark, Stephen, Pillay, Thasee and Schueler, Stephan (2018) Early Clinical Results of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve in 139 Patients: Freeman Experience. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 33 (1). pp. 8-14. ISSN 1678-9741

Preview

Text Early clinical results.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (162kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Perceval sutureless valve in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. We report the 30-day clinical outcomes of 139 patients.

METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2016, 139 patients underwent sutureless aortic valve replacement. Their operation notes, National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database and perioperative transoesophageal echocardiography findings were studied retrospectively.

RESULTS: Ninety-two patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (group A) with Perceval valve and 47 patients had combined procedures of aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (group B). The patients received a size S (n=23), M (n=39), L (n=42) or XL (n=35) prosthesis. Perceval valve was successfully implanted in 135 (97.1%) patients. Mean cross-clamping time and bypass time were 40 and 63 minutes for isolated cases, while 68 and 107 minutes for combined cases. Three (2.1%) patients died within 30 days. Four patients suffered stroke and 5 patients went into acute renal failure. Median intensive care unit and hospital stay was 2 and 8.5, respectively. Four valves were explanted due to significant paravalvular leak after surgery. Five patients had permanent pacemaker as a result of complete heart block and mean postoperative drainage was 295 mL for isolated case and 457 mL for combined cases. The mean gradient across Perceval valve was 12.5 mmHg while its effective orifice area was 1.5 cm2.

CONCLUSION: Early postoperative results showed that Perceval valve is safe. Further follow up is needed to evaluate the long-term outcome with this bioprosthesis.

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads