Science Friction: Streamlined Forensic Reporting, Reliability and Justice

Edmond, Gary, Carr, Sophie and Piasecki, Emma (2018) Science Friction: Streamlined Forensic Reporting, Reliability and Justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38 (4). pp. 764-792. ISSN 0143-6503

Edmond_Carr_Piasecki_Science_friction_Streamlined_forensic_reporting_reliability_and_justice.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (478kB) | Preview
Official URL:


Streamlined forensic reporting (SFR), introduced as part of the United Kingdom Ministry of Justice’s drive to deliver swift and sure justice, is credited with generating both time and cost efficiencies. Through the provision of radically abbreviated forensic reports at an early stage in criminal proceedings, SFR is said to avoid the cost of long form reports, facilitate agreement between the parties, secure more guilty pleas and reduce the number of defence challenges to forensic science evidence. This article questions these claims and the value of SFR as conceived. It suggests that the limited empirical evidence is mixed, and that SFR is incompatible with emerging trends and the best advice on the presentation of forensic science evidence. SFR directs little attention to the quality—that is, the validity and scientific reliability—of forensic science evidence. In overlooking quality, SFR introduces new risks of misrepresentation, misunderstanding and mistakes, and is unlikely to align with long-standing and fundamental criminal justice values (such as transparency, rationality, rectitude, equality of arms and fairness), and so is unlikely to fulfil the fundamental goal of dealing with cases justly.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Applied Sciences
Depositing User: Becky Skoyles
Date Deposited: 29 Nov 2018 13:06
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2021 12:49

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics