Mineralogy, solid-phase fractionation and chemical extraction to assess the mobility and availability of arsenic in an urban environment

Amaibi, Patrick, Entwistle, Jane, Kennedy, Nattalie, Cave, Mark, Kemp, Simon, Potgieter-Vermaak, Sanja and Dean, John (2019) Mineralogy, solid-phase fractionation and chemical extraction to assess the mobility and availability of arsenic in an urban environment. Applied Geochemistry, 100. pp. 244-257. ISSN 0883-2927

[img] Text (Full text)
Amaibi et al - Mineralogy, solid-phase fractionation and chemical extraction AAM.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (850kB)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.12.004

Abstract

A multi-disciplinary approach, using chemical extraction and analytical structural techniques, has been used to assess the mobility and availability of arsenic in urban soil samples from two current housing sites. Arsenic concentrations in each site varied between 126 – 1,660 mg/kg (Site A) and 40 – 24,900 mg/kg (Site B). Using a non-specific sequential extraction approach, it was possible to identify two distinct, site specific, As-containing fractions i.e. Fe-As-Ca (Site A) and As-Fe (Site B), in the soils. Further investigation using a sequential extraction approach identified the main As component in the reducible fraction, linking As with Fe-oxides in the soils. Further investigation of the crystalline mineral phases, by X-ray diffraction, within the most As-contaminated soils (up to 24,000 mg/kg) identified no As-bearing minerals but identified the major component as quartz (SiO2) with an array of minor and trace minerals. Further mineralogical investigation, using micro-Raman in the major As-contaminated soils (from Site B) as well as re-confirming the presence of the major mineral (quartz) additionally identified the As-bearing minerals pharmacosiderite (KFe4[(H2O)4(AsO4)3].6H2O) and mimetite (Pb5(AsO4)3Cl) in the trace mineral component, alongside amorphous carbon, chromite (FeCr2O4), goethite (α-FeO(OH)), gypsum (CaSO4.H2O), muscovite (KAl2(AlSi3O10)(F,OH)2), magnetite (Fe3O4), martite (α-Fe2O3), psilomelane (Ba,H2O)2Mn5O10), pyrrhotite (Fe7S8) and rutile (TiO2). The identification and presence of several Fe-rich minerals could be considered as the major hosts of As in the soil matrix. It is concluded that while the soil contains elevated levels of As, it’s lack of mobility in the soil, means that minimal remedial action is required provided the sites are left undisturbed and free of human endeavour and activity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: arsenic; urban soils; sequential extraction; mineralogy; risk assessment
Subjects: F100 Chemistry
F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
Department: Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Applied Sciences
Depositing User: Paul Burns
Date Deposited: 06 Dec 2018 15:06
Last Modified: 05 Dec 2019 03:30
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/37107

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics