Mason, Joel, Howatson, Glyn, Frazer, Alan J., Frazer, Ashlyn K., Pearce, Alan J., Jaberzadeh, Shapour, Avela, Janne and Kidgell, Dawson J. (2019) Modulation of intracortical inhibition and excitation in agonist and antagonist muscles following acute strength training. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 119 (10). pp. 2185-2199. ISSN 1439-6319
|
Text
Accepted version_Antagonist.pdf - Accepted Version Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purpose: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) usually investigates the corticospinal responses ofthe agonist muscle to strength training, despite the role of the antagonist muscle in strengthdevelopment. We examined the intracortical responses from an agonist and antagonist muscle followinga single session of heavy-loaded strength training (dominant-arm only) to identify the early antagonisticresponses to a single session that may accompany improvements in strength.Methods: Corticospinal and motor-cortical excitability and inhibition was collected from agonist andantagonist muscles prior to and following a single session of heavy-loaded wrist flexor training in 18individuals. Training consisted of 4 sets 6-8 repetitions at 80% of 1-repetition maximum (1-RM).Recruitment curves for corticospinal excitability and inhibition of the right wrist flexor and wristextensor muscles were constructed and assessed by examining the area under the recruitment curve(AURC). Intracortical measures were obtained using paired-pulse TMS.Results: Following a single training session, increases in corticospinal excitability (CSE) were observedin both the agonist and antagonist muscles. This was accompanied by decreases in corticospinalinhibition (CSP) in both muscles. Intracortical inhibition was reduced and intracortical facilitation wasincreased for the agonist muscle only. Intracortical measures in the antagonist muscle remainedunchanged after training.Conclusions: These findings indicate that the corticospinal responses to a single session of strengthtraining are similar between agonist and antagonist muscles, but the intrinsic cortico-cortical circuitryof the antagonist remains unchanged. The corticospinal responses are likely due to increasedinvolvement/co-activation of the antagonist muscle during training as the agonist muscle fatigues.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Agonist, antagonist, corticospinal excitability, corticospinal silent period, intracortical facilitation, short-interval cortical inhibition, strength training |
Subjects: | C600 Sports Science |
Department: | Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation |
Depositing User: | Elena Carlaw |
Date Deposited: | 31 Jul 2019 09:34 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jul 2021 12:05 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/40216 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year