Brown, Rupert and Paterson, Jenny (2016) Indirect contact and prejudice reduction: limits and possibilities. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11. pp. 20-24. ISSN 2352-250X
|
Text
AAM_Brown&Paterson_2016_COP_Indirect contact and prejudice reduction.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (484kB) | Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.005
Abstract
Here we review recent developments in the field of indirect intergroup contact, an extension of the classic Contact Hypothesis. Three forms of indirect contact are assessed: extended, vicarious and imagined. The strengths and limitations of each are evaluated. Although not as potent as direct contact, indirect forms of contact generally offer a more diverse set of practical solutions for reducing prejudice, especially in challenging contexts where direct contact may be infrequent or impossible.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | C800 Psychology L300 Sociology |
Department: | Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Psychology |
Depositing User: | Elena Carlaw |
Date Deposited: | 08 Aug 2019 16:03 |
Last Modified: | 01 Aug 2021 10:51 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/40284 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year