Amankwaa, Aaron and Mccartney, Carole (2020) Gaughran vs the UK and public acceptability of forensic biometrics retention. Science & Justice, 60 (3). pp. 204-205. ISSN 1355-0306
|
Text
SCIJUS_Manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (421kB) | Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.04.001
Abstract
This commentary provides a response to the European Court of Human Rights ruling in the case of Gaughran vs the United Kingdom on 13 February 2020. The Court ruled that the indefinite retention of DNA, fingerprints and facial images from all convicted adults was disproportionate. Using data from a survey on public attitudes, we examine the public acceptability of the police retention of forensic biometrics from the population.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Forensic biometrics, Forensic databases, Retention, Privacy, Public security, Public attitudes |
Subjects: | F400 Forensic and Archaeological Science M200 Law by Topic |
Department: | Faculties > Health and Life Sciences > Applied Sciences |
Depositing User: | Elena Carlaw |
Date Deposited: | 22 Apr 2020 11:31 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jul 2021 15:46 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/42881 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year