Fingerprint evidence in New Zealand’s courts: The oversight of overstatement

Edmond, Gary (2020) Fingerprint evidence in New Zealand’s courts: The oversight of overstatement. New Zealand Universities Law Review, 29 (1). pp. 1-29. ISSN 0549-0618

Edmond fingerprints NZULR Overstatement II sent.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (779kB) | Preview
Official URL:


This article documents the persistent misrepresentation and misunderstanding of the most ubiquitous forensic science of the past century. That is, the treatment of latent fingerprint evidence as categorical identification of a specific person. Following a review of the manner in which latent fingerprint evidence was presented in trials and appeals, starting at the beginning of the 20th century and continuing until the present, it introduces scientific research and advice. This juxtaposition allows us to observe how New Zealand’s legal institutions have not required fingerprint examiners to temper their claims in response to mainstream scientific research and advice (emerging largely out of the United States and the United Kingdom). In conclusion, drawing upon scientific recommendations, the article explains what is required to make the claims of latent fingerprint examiners scientifically grounded such that their probative opinions can be evaluated in ways that facilitate the goals of rectitude and fairness.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: Elena Carlaw
Date Deposited: 03 Jun 2020 12:05
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2021 15:06

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics