The common law influence over the age of criminal responsibility - Australia

Crofts, Thomas (2016) The common law influence over the age of criminal responsibility - Australia. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 67 (3). pp. 283-300. ISSN 0029-3105

Preview

Text Doli_NILQ_67_3_3_Crofts.pdf - Published Version Download (212kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article explores how Australian jurisdictions came to have an approach to the age of criminal responsibility similar to that which existed in England and Wales until 1998. It discusses recent debates in Australia about reforming the minimum age of criminal responsibility and the presumption of doli incapax. This shows that while there has been criticism of the presumption of doli incapax within Australia no jurisdiction has taken the English step of abolishing it. It finds that a greater challenge to the presumption of doli incapax may, however, come from calls for an increase in the minimum age of criminal responsibility to the age of 12. While several common law countries have raised the minimum age level to 12 (as called for by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child), they have also abolished the presumption of doli incapax, thus reducing protection for 12- and 13-year-olds. This article argues that unless the minimum age of criminal responsibility is raised to 14 or 16, as preferred by the UN Committee, there are good reasons to retain the presumption of doli incapax.

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads