Cerci, Sena, Cecchinato, Marta and Vines, John (2021) How Design Researchers Interpret Probes: Understanding the Critical Intentions of a Designerly Approach to Research. In: CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, p. 624. ISBN 9781450380966
|
Text
Cerci_chi21-288_accesible pdf[13].pdf - Accepted Version Download (679kB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Text
chi21b_sub7537_cam_i16_1_.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (335kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Since entering the HCI lexicon in the 1990s, Probes have been interpreted and used in divergent ways as a designerly approach to research. While originally positioned as a critique of dominant user-research methods, literature on Probes rarely reflects on such critical dimensions nor explicitly articulates the intents of using Probes as research artifacts. We conducted interviews with 12 design researchers who have worked with Probes within diverse Research through Design projects, exploring direct accounts of how and why Probes are used in practice. Our interviews brought to the fore the critical concerns behind Probe practices in relation to the language of Probing, relationships with participants, and motivations to challenge normative practices. While the pluralistic interpretations of Probes offered by our participants brings challenges, we discuss how making visible the critical motivations of our research opens up new ways of practicing and disseminating Probes.
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | probes, research through design, cultural probes, design methods |
Subjects: | G400 Computer Science W200 Design studies |
Department: | Faculties > Arts, Design and Social Sciences > Design Faculties > Engineering and Environment > Computer and Information Sciences |
Depositing User: | John Coen |
Date Deposited: | 03 Mar 2021 11:16 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jul 2021 11:02 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/45599 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year