The Prevalence of the Montreal Convention After the 2017 STF Decision; What about Jurisdiction?

Defossez, Delphine and Carrasco Medina, Janny (2021) The Prevalence of the Montreal Convention After the 2017 STF Decision; What about Jurisdiction? Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Brasília, 5 (1). pp. 43-63. ISSN 2318-9908

102118.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (428kB) | Preview
jurisdiction-after-the-stf-decision-1-2-1.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (279kB) | Preview
Official URL:


This article analyses the possible impacts of the 2017 Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) decision, which put an end to the long-standing dispute regarding the prevalence of the Montreal Convention over the Codigo de Proteçao e Defesa do Consumidor (CDC), on jurisdiction. Indeed, the Montreal Convention contains an article regulating jurisdiction in case of both delays (Article 33(1)) and death or bodily injury (Article 33(2)). This provision is mostly in line with Article 21 of the Novo Código de Processo Civil (CPC). However, in some situations a conflict might occur. The article first analyses the decision and then the conflicts between Article 33 Montreal and Article 21 CPC. It then looks at various interpretations of Article 33 around the world and the concept of forum non conveniens. It concludes that the conflicts might only be present in theory, as some interpretations of Article 33 would be in line with the manner Brazilian courts already decide cases.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Montreal Convention, New CPC, CDC, Jurisdiction, STF judgment
Subjects: M200 Law by Topic
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School
Depositing User: John Coen
Date Deposited: 28 Apr 2021 13:34
Last Modified: 06 Aug 2021 15:15

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics