Reed, Alan and Sarahne, Muhammad (2021) Anglo-American Perspectives on Omissions Liability: Theoretical and Substantive Contours of Criminalisation and Optimal Reform Pathways. Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8 (1). pp. 205-248. ISSN 2313-3775
|
Text
9. A. Reed M. Sarahne.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0. Download (513kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article examines the omission–commission binary dividethat is of extant significance within Anglo-American criminal law theory anddoctrine. In English law, it has been encaptured in a seminal academic debatebetween Williams and Ashworth, who have propagated opposite stances withrespect to criminal liability for omission. American law has also witnessedsignificant scholarly discourse in this arena, especially on the propriety of thelegal duty requirement. Leavens has proposed we abolish this requirementand the act/omission distinction altogether, examining instead the causallink between the offender’s course of conduct and the prescribed harm(s).Normative and philosophical debates within American and English law andparticularised concerns applicable to substantive precepts in each jurisdictionare evaluated. An array of issues are deconstructed, notably the legal dutyrequirement and its scope, the offences that may be committed by omissionand specific concerns that Anglo-American law fails to meet fair warning andlegality standardisations. There is a novel and distinctive comparative analysisof alternative perspectives on criminalisation, and creation of a dangeroussituation and legal duty to rescue principles are analysed via dépecage (issuesplitting) analysis across a spectrum of five bespoke compartmentalisations.Good Samaritan laws as part of optimal reform proposals on failure to rescueand failure to report harm(s) are proposed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | omission liability, Anglo-American criminal law perspectives, fair warning and legality, Good Samaritan laws, creation of dangerous situations, duty to rescue and to report, optimal reforms |
Subjects: | M100 Law by area M200 Law by Topic |
Department: | Faculties > Business and Law > Northumbria Law School |
Depositing User: | Elena Carlaw |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2021 10:12 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jun 2022 03:31 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/46484 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year