Half the earth for people (or more)? Addressing ethical questions in conservation

Kopnina, Helen (2016) Half the earth for people (or more)? Addressing ethical questions in conservation. Biological Conservation, 203. pp. 176-185. ISSN 0006-3207

10.1016j.biocon.2016.09.019.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (183kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.019


Preserving global biodiversity depends upon designating many more large terrestrial and marine areas as strictly protected areas. Yet recent calls for addressing biodiversity loss by setting aside more protected areas have been met with hostility from some social scientists and even some conservation biologists. The main objections against the so-called 'nature needs half' movement include the following. First, setting aside protected areas implies that some vulnerable human communities will be displaced to make space for wildlife. Second, separating humans from their environment ignores the fact that humans have always been part of the environments around them, and creates a false dichotomy between nature and culture. Third, conservationists are said to put the blame for biodiversity loss on all humanity, rather than on those who are doing most of the damage. Fourth, many social justice proponents argue that human population growth is not related to biodiversity loss or other sustainability challenges. This article critically addresses these four objections, exposing their robust anthropocentric bias. Protected area critics reliably demand fairness for human beings at the expense of nonhuman beings, who they treat as morally inconsequential. But justice is not only about just us. Conservation properly understood implies a fair division of Earth's resources between human and nonhuman beings. Justice demands setting aside at least half Earth's lands and seas for nature, free from intensive economic activities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Animal rights, Anthropocentrism, Biodiversity loss, Conservation, Ecological justice, Environmental justice
Subjects: F800 Physical and Terrestrial Geographical and Environmental Sciences
L900 Others in Social studies
Department: Faculties > Business and Law > Newcastle Business School
Depositing User: Rachel Branson
Date Deposited: 19 Nov 2021 10:05
Last Modified: 19 Nov 2021 10:15
URI: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/47789

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics