MacLeod, Nicola (2021) Art vs Craft Expert Evidence in the England and Wales Criminal Justice System. Language and Law = Linguagem e Direito, 8 (1). pp. 43-58. ISSN 2183-3745
|
Text
04-llld8-1-macleod.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0. Download (836kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article describes procedures surrounding expert testimony in U.S. federal courts, exemplifying with details of an expert’s experience in one case. The exemplar is a civil (not criminal) case brought for defamation, tried to a jury in a federal district court, and subsequently appealed to a higher court. The article discusses reasons for which attorneys retain expert linguists, why courts welcome experts when their testimony is deemed helpful in deciding a disputed fact but exclude them if they are not qualified or the proffered testimony is deemed insufficiently helpful or possibly prejudicial to a jury. The article concludes with observations about the pros and cons of serving as a linguistics expert in contested legal matters in an adversarial system.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Expert evidence, determining meaning, standards, drill. |
Subjects: | M200 Law by Topic M900 Other in Law W900 Others in Creative Arts and Design |
Department: | Faculties > Arts, Design and Social Sciences > Humanities |
Depositing User: | Elena Carlaw |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jan 2022 15:31 |
Last Modified: | 07 Jan 2022 15:45 |
URI: | http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/48101 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year